Impact Blog
What I told the Senate today

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Calvert disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Calvert are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Calvert fund. References to individual companies for Engagement or Research purposes are provided for illustrative purposes only and may not be representative of the results of all of Calvert’s engagement efforts. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

  • All Posts
  • More
    Topics
      Authors

      Filter Insights by Date:   Start Date   End Date   or  Show recent results
      The article below is presented as a single post. Click here to view all posts.

      By John WilsonDirector of Corporate Engagement

      Washington - Earlier today, I had the privilege of testifying before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety on the subject of "Reducing Emissions While Driving Economic Growth: Industry-led Initiatives."

      In my testimony, I discussed the importance of mitigating the potential effects of climate change on investment returns and outlined how Calvert manages exposure to these risks. I noted that we see a clear consensus among both investment professionals and corporate executives that voluntary efforts will not be enough, since business incentives are misaligned. Those responsible for the emission of greenhouse gases do not bear the costs of climate-related harms such as extreme weather events, drought, and sea level rise -- instead, these costs are borne by us all.

      I discussed how a carbon tax or similar policy signal could allow investors to better quantify the economic implications of climate change on investments and more efficiently allocate capital to investments suitable for the low-carbon economy, and urged the Committee to support legislation that will allow key economic actors to rapidly scale existing efforts to address the significant risks posed by climate change.

      To read my testimony and view the hearing, click here.

      Bottom line: Calvert hopes that this and similar efforts provide an opportunity for constructive dialogue on how to ensure that the capital markets have the best information and incentives to manage the uncertainties related to climate change.